![enola gay movie 1980 enola gay movie 1980](http://www.truetvmovies.net/uploads/1/1/8/1/11818406/s857550832498008597_p3023_i4_w352.jpeg)
The making of the films is as revealing as the films themselves. Each was subject to political pressure or scrutiny. The three Hollywood films have much in common: Each was highly touted and directed by a talented film maker but was an artistic failure. Perhaps that is why the films all grapple with the notion of American decency. American directors exploring Hiroshima seem bound to the docudrama form, a literal approach inappropriate for this revolutionary and psychologically ambiguous event - and one that makes few emotional demands on its creators and the audience.Īmbivalence or guilt is certain to be evoked by any cinematic treatment of Hiroshima. Only three Hollywood movies have emerged about the making or use of the first atomic bombs. Almost all of them are works of pure fiction, imagining nuclear attacks in the near or distant future while ignoring the two instances when atomic weapons have already been used: Nagasaki and Hiroshima. What is striking is that few of these films say anything directly about Hiroshima. But whereas the creations of earlier inventors once merely threatened a village, after Hiroshima they endangered an entire world. This is nothing new witness the "Frankenstein" movie from 1931 and, even earlier, Mary Shelley's novel. The well-intentioned but dangerously naive scientist became a stock character. Strangelove"), and several others explored the issue thoughtfully ("Fail-Safe," "The War Game," "Testament" and "Desert Bloom").īut more often the fear of nuclear war in Hollywood spawned survivalist fantasies, irradiated-monster films and post-apocalypse thrillers. Americans have been exposed to several foreign films on the subject, most notably Akira Kurosawa's "Rhapsody in August," Shohei Imamura's "Black Rain" and, of course, Alain Resnais's classic 1959 drama "Hiroshima, Mon Amour." These films are original or highly imaginative and contain striking images.Īt least one American "nuclear" film was a work of genius ("Dr. Since September 1945, when "First Yank in Tokyo" brought the mushroom cloud to the screen, hundreds if not thousands of "nuclear" movies have appeared.
![enola gay movie 1980 enola gay movie 1980](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4d/7a/b0/4d7ab02b7ec6fea72cfb5e29b6338d0f.jpg)
What these artistic statements share, however, with rare exceptions, is an avoidance of the specific subject of Hiroshima. They have offered cautionary works that depict the horror of the bomb or its meaning in our society. CREATIVE ARTISTS OF EVERY variety have made incisive, satiric or powerful statements about nuclear threat.